The Holy Shroud of Turin
The Holy Shroud of Turin - One
of the most intriguing mysteries connected with Our Lord’s life is what
happened to the shroud in which He was buried. Surely the disciples
must have taken it and kept it securely. But what happened to it later?
Many people believe that the Shroud is still in existence and is kept in
a special chapel in Turin in Italy.
The
Shroud of Turin, or the Holy Shroud as it is usually called, is reputed
to be the cloth in which the body of Christ was wrapped for his burial.
It is undoubtedly the most controversial relic of all time, the object
of mystery and fascination for Christians for centuries. No other such
object has been subjected to such intense and prolonged scrutiny
particularly in this century. From the time it first came to light in
the 14th century, it has repeatedly been proclaimed a fake by
historians, by scientists, and even by Church leaders. Shortly after
its discovery the Bishop of the diocese where it was being publicly
displayed appealed to the Pope to stop the scandal caused by its
veneration. He claimed that an artist had confessed to have painted it.
In our own century the 1912 edition of the Catholic Encyclopaedia
states flatly that it was painted, but the 1967 edition, though more
cautious, claims that “its acceptance today is more common than it was
in the past.” Yet none of this has discouraged millions of people from
venerating it as the Shroud of Christ. Such crowds were anticipated for
its public showing in the year 2000, that it was necessary to have a
ticket even to get on the line to view it.
What
does the shroud look like? It is an ivory-coloured linen cloth with a
small admixture of cotton, but without any wool. Its weave is
herring-bone twill. It is a little over 14 ft. in length and 3½ in
width, or for our younger readers, 4.36 m x 1.1 m. It is at least 600
years old. As we shall see, these details are important in determining
the authenticity of the Shroud. There are many marks on it. On the night
of 3/4 December 1532, a fire broke out in the chapel where it was kept
in a silver repository. The molten silver scorched the cloth in several
places before it was rescued. Later triangular patches were sewn in to
repair the worst of the scorch damage. Fortunately those marks are at
the sides and do not interfere with the main image.
But
it is the marks down the centre of the cloth which are intriguing. They
are a faint representation of a human body, both back and front, a
bearded male with long hair, 5’ 11” tall and weighing approximately 175
lbs. Apparently the body was laid on the cloth with its feet at one end,
and the cloth doubled back over the head down to the feet again so that
the whole body was covered. Consequently there are two life-size
images, back and front, lying head to head down the middle of the cloth.
The
man has apparently suffered considerable violence. Careful examination
reveals abrasions, bruises and swellings, there are traces of various
blood flows, from the head, the wrist, feet, and particularly from the
side, from which the blood flows apparently from an incision between the
fifth and sixth rib. His back, from the shoulders down to the ankles,
is liberally spattered with more than a hundred dumb-bell shaped cuts
where the skin has apparently been broken by blows with a leaded whip
such as the Romans used. His right cheek is swollen as if from a blow.
Contrary to Roman custom, his legs are not broken.
But
there is no trace of actual blood on the cloth, nor has scientific
analysis been able to discover traces of any other material which might
have been used to imitate blood, or of pigment which might have been
used to paint the marks on the cloth. Perhaps the strangest fact of all
is that those marks are only on the surface, they have not penetrated
the fibres at all as they would have done if they were made by real
blood or by any sort of paint. Yet, the representation of the various
blood-flows on the cloth is, according to scientists, highly accurate.
So
much for what the shroud actually looks like. Let us take a look at its
history. It can be traced back by documentary evidence to the village
of Lirey in France where, in 1354, it was in the possession of a knight,
Geoffrey de Charny. A century later, in 1453 it came into the
possession of the Duke of Savoy and was placed in Chambery, the capital
of Savoy, where it sustained the damage mentioned above. The Duke of
Savoy later became ruler of part of the north of Italy and moved the
Shroud to Turin where he planned to move his capital. A special chapel
was built for it and until recently it was kept rolled up around a pole,
inside a silvered wooden reliquary behind a grill above the altar.
Recently, because of several attempts to destroy it by people breaking
in and setting fire to the chapel, it has been removed to a place of
greater security. However, an exact replica is on public display at all
times in the chapel. The late ex-king of Italy, Umberto II, who lived in
Portugal, willed it to the Church, so that it is now the property of
the Vatican.
0 comments:
Post a Comment